You don't really specify if it is better art, or if it is...
Road kill is better than art
Argument: Your argument is unfounded since you fail to provide ground rules for said debate.. Is roadkill better? a) as a sport? b) as better art? You don't really specify if it is better art, or if it is better than art? Thus, I conclude by saying your argument as specified by Round 1 is still in a gray area of circular logic and paradoxical. Sorry!