args

Nude art is good contribution to the world of art

Well, first off, how is nude art a representation of the artists creativity? Is not art a reflextion into the mind of the artist? If one made a nude work of art, does that not mean they had flesh on the brain? Thus, as they make it, they are using it to describe a personal sexual desire in some way. Then, as the artist themselves made it with such a purpose doesn't that make the work pornographic in the artists view? Wasn't excitment the origonal purpose of the work itself? I am guessing that if an attractive, naked woman were to be infront of you, you would be arroused. Can you honestly not say that her fleshy appearance is not the least bit invigorating? Could you honestly say that the first thoughts upon viewing the persona of the female is "life" or would it be "desire"? If you can you have an awfully strong will. But as it goes, attraction is a natural phenomenon, thus a person will nearly always be attracted to the opposite sex, especially if they are exposing one's self. In this time where human censorship is common place, the revelation of their bodies is a high arrosal point. So, if it is freely presented it will always take the form of sexual nature, and so it will be in life or But as it goes, attraction is a natural phenomenon, thus a person will nearly always be attracted to the opposite sex, especially if they are exposing one's self. In this time where human censorship is common place, the revelation of their bodies is a high arrosal point. So, if it is freely presented it will always take the form of sexual nature, and so it will be in life or art. If the human body was not censored, and people walked naked amoung the streets, then it would be common placed and would not be so easily arroused. However, in this day and age, it is impossible for one to not find pleasure in the exposal of the opposite's body. If an artist shows a naked body than it will be thought of in a sexual nature if it proves to be attractive. Such is human Nature. Art will not change it. I do agree with you one the origional basis, but at this point and time a naked body will not have an artist effect on the mind, morely a sensual one. The artist intent could be fine, but the ends will not meet sadly. So, for todays society, an exposed body will be pornographic in nature, and any artist who makes such art, is thus also fabricating pornography.