He simply states that art and music are somehow essential...
I agree that art and music should be essential to learn in school.
Alright I will offer my conclusion as briefly as possible. Level 1: My opponent completely drops my argument thereby proving that he does not agree with anyone or anything. Level 2: My opponent once again drops my argument in order to reiterate his points. He simply states that art and music are somehow essential with no evidence to back this claim up at all. My points from earlier thereby all still stand. Being: 1. Not everyone is good at art and music. 2. Other activities offer the same benefits as art and music. 3. Being in art and music potentially detracts from other activities an individual would like to do. 4. Individuals should have freedom of choice, a right to choose what activity best suits there needs and capabilities. Extracurricular activities should pushed by school administration as desirable. With all these points still standing I see nothing but a Con vote. Thank you.