args

A conclusion to the art of communication

Is that the best you have as to shout the messenger with another ad hominem with; I would suggest that the notion of "monotone abuse" is being used here as nothing more than a personally derived criticism, aimed at something that for some reason doesn't sit easy within Pro's mind. Even what you have written is full of an inability to converse constructively within a structured text. with; 1/ easy could have been easily. 2/ personally, derived criticism is no more than a personal attack upon the messenger. 3/ aimed at something that for some reason doesn't sit easy within Pro's mind is also an attack upon the sanity of the messenger. How is it that you can do this are you also; Is something just missing or not; passion, frustration and anger. Where is apathetic? Hiding behind the anger and frustration for passion within expression, falls away real fast doesn't it? You have automatically become defensive within your own rational reasoning of your own cognitive drive that seems to have sidetracked you as to not even considered to answer any of the questions that I have put forward. All you have done is attacked my own character and exposed your own flawed logic. 1/ So if wisdom is to have the ability to have a structured conversation with the village idiot and accepting that tomorrow it's my turn to be the village idiot. Explaining complexities in the simplest manner is just like nuts and bolts. The hardest part is knowing how to put it all back together. What would you say to that? 2/ Would you trust a salesman selling snake oil that speaks with a forked tongue? 3/ Is something just missing or not; passion, frustration and anger. Where is apathetic? Hiding behind the anger and frustration for passion within expression, falls away real fast doesn't it? 4/ Let us try this again, shall we?