Art should be graded. Schools generally grade art based...
Art should not be graded at school ( Or atleast not depending the student's actual skill )
'Art should be graded. Schools generally grade art based on student knowledge and appreciation of techniques and variety of art. A student's own artwork is not heavily judged. But knowledge of art is a skill in of itself. ' I don't know where do you come from, But in Canada atleast, Your art is judged. Your knowledge of art don't matter and you can throw it in the trash. I never learnt a single thing about the story of art. I get given a paper, And then you need to draw something. This surely is not a single case and a large number of people probably have the same thing as I 'If you say it shouldn't be graded because some kids have a personal problem then fine, Schools can make exceptions. ' It can't. They can't just not grade a whole subject, And most teachers are apparently too retarded to understand that some people have problems with art, And it isn't something you can ' study ' about ( well you can but it's time confusing ) ' But this debate is talking in generalizations. In general, Schools should grade art. If they don't, Then why even have it as a subject? If schools have art as a subject, They should grade it, Otherwise they're wasting people's time. People can learn and do art at home. ' Then remove art. My point is that art shouldn't be graded, Weither or not it should actually exist, It isn't my point, I don't care, I would be okay for art to not even exist. It isn't my point at all.