With live there must always be skill and practice in...
Loving is an art
Pro- Contention 1: The Justification of love- -First those with Savant Syndrome are not the norm, and thus the standard cannot be based on these people. Second those with Savant Syndrome are skilled with an activity art (painting, sculpting, acting). Not something that envelopes a personality aspect. With live there must always be skill and practice in place, because even if to the smallest amount; all people both need and are given love in order to survive to grow to be old enough to love in the first place. - Maintaining love through a difficulty My opponent has not refuted my prior argument, but has simply extended their own argument through. Accordingly this argument is a drop. Contention 2: The Artisan continues the art- My opponent claims that egotistical self-love still counts as mature love, however as a direct quote from round 1, "If a person loves only one other person and is indifferent to all others, his love is not love..." It is not love, and my opponent's arguments are nothing but semantic attacks. Con- Contention 1- - My opponent offers no warrant for this point. The mother may be raising her child simply to avoid the social implications of giving it up for adoption, or because she loves her husband. otherwise the love for the child is inherent, and again not bound to the burden of the round. Contention 2- - My opponent is missing the point of my argument, and has utterly dropped her own point here. - Love doesn't have to be reciprocal to fall into the boundary of mature love.