So since my opponent has forfeited his rounds, my...
art is needed in todays society
So since my opponent has forfeited his rounds, my extension of my arguments during previous rounds is well justified. Why to vote for con: The instigator presents no evidence for his claims and there is actually evidence against his assertions made in round one. On top of that, there is a fallacy at work with my opponent's opening round. Thus, you should vote for con. With that said, I thank you all for reading. Good night! :D