It's a well known fact that if needles are infected with...
Resolved: The "Act to Limit Body Art Procedures" ought pass in the state of Arkansas.
And with that we shall begin. Sir, have you considered the health risks that having a tattoo poses and the effect that it has only employability. It's a well known fact that if needles are infected with contaminated blood, then blood borne diseases, such as tetanus, syphilis, Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C could be contracted. An STD for the sake of looking rebellious: really? In addition, a lack of tattoos results in a higher employability. Managers would no longer need to worry about employees having to cover up their 'body art', in order to comply with dress codes. When it comes to interviews, tattoos leave a bad impression on future employees, due to their association with the criminal world. With more people able to work, more people will. This would result in a higher employment percentage for the state, meaning that the rate of poverty would also also be reduced. And so, by banning dermal implants and scarification, the health risk to the population would be lowered and yet the employment rate of the state would rise. Your turn, Horseman!