args

Separate the art from the character or personification of the artist

I don't quite follow everything in what was posted but judging by the last paragraph, There appears to be agreement here. Viewing art by a bad character is not wrong. The is the topic of the debate or what's suppose to be. Separating the art or the collective works is about judging according to the merits of it. Let the work speak for itself. Maybe you're not aware but because of the personal lives of these individuals, Their collective arts have been terminated from being broadcast-ed or distributed. I'm not certain whether currently the cancellation of these works have been lifted or not. We can agree the artist that designed the art is related. Not much else is relevant, Especially when the work has been designed to produce positive influence. Their personal circumstances should not enter into it or be an influence. I understand because of Ms. Roseanne Barr's commentary, It influenced some people that had an affect on her career. That had more to do with ratings, Appealing to people that would watch a t. V. Show. These are people that tie personal politics to somebody's work for a living. Again, Not allowing the merits of the work speak for itself. In this case amusing people, Making folks laugh, Is overshadowed by the sensitivity to the person's or performer's character. So whether it's a murderer or bank robber, Their contributions or donations to several charities and hospitals are positive deeds.